Orientación para la investigación global sobre educación interprofesional y práctica colaborativa. Documento de trabajo / Guidance on global interprofessional education and collaborative practice research: discussion paper / Orientação sobre pesquisa global em educação interprofissional e prática colaborativa: documento de trabalho

Este documento de trabajo fue elaborado por varios expertos en EIPC de renombre mundial durante el último año para estimular una mayor discusión sobre la investigación global en EIPC. La publicación ofrece perspectivas para informar las discusiones en torno a la agenda de investigación global en EIPC mediante la identificación de prioridades de investigación y proporcionando orientación sobre marcos teóricos, metodologías y composición de equipos de investigación. Un léxico propuesto para el campo interprofesional también se proporciona como un apéndice. El léxico sirve como documento de debate para desarrollar el consenso sobre la terminología relacionada con la educación, el aprendizaje, la práctica y la atención interprofesionales.

This Discussion Paper aims to provide guidance on IPECP research. We provide a perspective of the current situation and the needs in IPECP research around the globe, make recommendations for research teams to advance IPECP theory-informed research by 2022, and invite collaborators to join us in this initiative. The appendix provides a proposed lexicon for the interprofessional field based on the current interprofessional literature. This lexicon serves as a starting point in developing a global consensus on a set of definitions and descriptions related to interprofessional education, learning, practice, and care. In doing so, and in response to the Article 4 of the Sydney Interprofessional Declaration (All Together Better Health V, 2010), IPR.Global and Interprofessional. Global plan to conduct a web-based global Delphi panel in early 2020.

Este Documento de trabalho visa orientar pesquisas na área da EIPC. Nele fornecemos uma perspectiva sobre a situação atual e as necessidades mundiais em termos de pesquisa nessa área, fazemos recomendações para equipes de esquisas, informadas por teorias, para que alcancem avanços na EIPC até 2022, e convidamos colaboradores a participarem conosco nesta iniciativa. O Apêndice propõe um léxico para o campo interprofissional com base na literatura interprofissional atual. Esse léxico serve como ponto de partida para o desenvolvimento de um consenso global sobre uma série de definições e descritores relacionados à educação, ao aprendizado, à prática e à atenção interprofissional. Após propô-lo, e em resposta ao Artigo 4º da Declaração Interprofissional de Sydney (All Together Better Health V, 2010), o IPR.Global e o plano da Interprofessional.Global têm por objetivo conduzir um encontro com especialistas de todo o mundo, via Internet, no início de 2020.

The medication information line for the elderly: an 8-year cumulative analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To present an 8-year (1985-1992) cumulative analysis of the 12,743 calls received by the Medication Information Line for the Elderly (MILE), a consumer-oriented drug information service. DESIGN: Data on all calls received by MILE were documented using a standard format. Certain calls were selected by the pharmacist for follow-up based on the nature and predicted severity of the inquiry. SETTING: MILE is located within the Faculty of Pharmacy of the University of Manitoba and staffed by experienced, practicing pharmacists. Calls were received from the elderly and their care providers. Calls were initially taken on a local Winnipeg line, although in 1987 a toll-free number was made available to rural Manitoba residents. RESULTS: The majority of the calls received by MILE were from women aged 65 years or older who accessed MILE on their own initiative. Ninety-one percent of the calls were rated as not serious. Only 6% of calls were from outside Winnipeg. Although 94% of the older consumers reported having a regular pharmacist, they commonly never thought of using their pharmacist for inquiries. The drugs cited most often by consumers, nurses, physicians, and dentists were the nonsteroidal antiinflammatory agents, cardiac drugs, diuretics, antihypertensives, benzodiazepines, and antidepressants. The type of inquiries most frequently involved adverse drug reactions, drug interactions, and therapeutic use. The drugs cited and inquiries made by pharmacist callers were more diverse than those of consumers and other healthcare professionals. CONCLUSIONS: Many older drug consumers have medication information needs that are not being met. Since a large proportion of the callers appeared to be self-motivated women, MILE may not be accessing all older consumers in need of information. This analysis also suggests that many older consumers are not aware that the pharmacist is available and capable of providing drug information.

Pill count, self-report, and pharmacy claims data to measure medication adherence in the elderly.

OBJECTIVE: To compare medication adherence calculated from four different data sources including a pill count and self-report obtained during a home medication history, as well as calculations based on refill frequency derived from a provincial prescription claims database (manual and electronic). DESIGN: Baseline medication adherence was collected as part of a prospective, randomized, controlled study. Mean medication adherence results obtained from the four data sources were compared using repeated-measures ANOVA followed by a Tukey's multiple range test. SETTING: A pharmacy consultation service located at an interdisciplinary wellness center for noninstitutionalized elderly. PATIENTS: 65 years or older, noninstitutionalized, taking one or more prescribed or nonprescribed medications. Clients would either present to the wellness center or be referred by the Provincial Home Care program. RESULTS: When calculated from self-report or manual or electronic prescription claims data, mean percent adherence by drug was high and not statistically different (95.8% +/- 17.1%, 107.6% +/- 40.3%, and 94.6% +/- 24.0%, respectively), whereas the pill count adherence was significantly lower at 74.0% +/- 41.5% (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: An unexpected finding was that the pill count technique used in this study of elderly clients using chronic, repeat medications appeared to underestimate medication adherence. Numerous other limitations of pill count, self-report, and a province-wide prescription claims database in estimating medication adherence are presented. When using medication adherence as a process measure, the researcher and practitioner should be aware of the limitations unique to the data source they choose, and interpret data cautiously.

Medical and dental status of a culture in transition, the case of the Inuit elderly of Canada.

The medical and dental status, and drug utilisation patterns of Canadian Inuit elders (60+ years) were evaluated. Inuit elders averaged 6.3 medical conditions per person, primarily nervous systems-sense organ deficits, respiratory problems and systemic infections. The mean number of drugs being used was 2.5 per person, primarily analgesics, bronchodilators and antibiotics. Poorly fitting dentures, and high levels of tooth decay, periodontal disease, soft tissue and TMJ anomalies were documented. Compared to older southern Canadians, the medical and dental findings for these Inuit elders were different. Drug utilisation rates were consistent with older southern Canadians, but different drugs were taken.

The development of a medication reminder card for elderly persons.

This paper describes the development and testing of a medication reminder card specifically designed for elderly persons on complex drug regimens. The need for such a system was confirmed by a survey of approximately 100 Canadian hospital pharmacy departments where no system provided at discharge by respondents met with our criteria for the "ideal" card. The new medication reminder card was tested in 29 ambulatory and 16 institutionalized elderly persons. Over 75 percent of patients continued to use the card two weeks post enrollment and a majority of ambulatory elderly were still using the card at six weeks. In addition to organizing medications and providing a reminder for patients to take drugs, the card facilitated communication with the pharmacist (a mean of 20 minutes) and with other health care professionals. Patients found the card easy to read and the system easy to understand. Despite time constraints, eight of nine participating community pharmacists indicated they would continue to use the system for select patients. A major obstacle to the use of the card was patient reluctance, for a variety of reasons. Although the card will require further modification in design, it provides a useful alternative as a compliance aid for ambulatory and hospitalized patients on chronic, complex drug regimens.

Prescribing patterns for older heavy drug users living in the community.

We report an analysis of prescription drugs claimed under a government-sponsored, universal Pharmacare program for community-dwelling adults aged greater than or equal to 50 years in Manitoba during 1975, 1978, 1981, and 1984. We limited our analysis to claimants who reported over six drugs in a year in order to control for effects of inflation and a changing deductible. The median number of prescribed drugs and the percent of claimants over age 50 years receiving prescriptions from multiple physicians decreased during the course of our study. In this sample of heavy drug users, age and sex did not consistently correlate with overall drug use, although there was correlation for specific drug groups. The relative ranking of prescribed drugs changed over the years, although benzodiazepines, thiazide diuretics, topical steroids, and codeine-containing analgesics remained near the top. Barbiturates and topical antibiotics showed the greatest drop in prescription rates; acetaminophen and beta-blockers increased the most. Using these community data, we project the prevalence of drug-related adverse events to be highest with beta-blockers, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, thiazide diuretics, and benzodiazepines.

Drug-associated hospital admissions in older medical patients.

A survey of drug-related admissions of patients aged 50 years and older was conducted at the Health Sciences Centre, Winnipeg to determine the interrelationship of risk factors, and isolate the effect of age. All nonelective medical admissions were prospectively assessed to determine the role of drug therapy as a contributory factor. Of the 863 eligible admissions, 162 exhibited at least one drug-related adverse patient event (DRAPE) at the time of hospitalization. This accounted for 19% of the admissions (23% of 718 admissions that involved prescription drugs). Although adverse drug reactions were responsible for many DRAPEs (48%), intentional noncompliance (27%), treatment failure (19%), alcohol (14%), and medication error (10%) were also frequent contributing causes. Drugs commonly implicated in DRAPEs were systemic steroids, digoxin, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents, alpha-methyldopa, calcium channel blockers, beta-blockers, theophylline, furosemide, sympathomimetics, thiazides, and benzodiazepines. The risk of a DRAPE was related to the number of diseases prior to admission (r = 0.81; P less than .026) and the number of drugs used (r = 0.77; P less than .001). Age was not correlated with the risk of a DRAPE. Females had significantly more adverse drug reactions, although sex was not a predictor for overall DRAPE risk.

The Medication Information Line for the Elderly. A consumer/health care professional-oriented drug information service.

The experiences of a drug information telephone service aimed at older adults, their care providers, and health care professionals are presented. The Medication Information Line for the Elderly received 1,561 telephone calls over the 12 months since its opening. The majority of callers (73%) were female and 723 (46%) of the 1,561 calls came from people in the 65 to 79 age group. Nearly one-third of all enquiries were about suspected drug-related adverse drug reactions. The drugs most commonly causing concern (as classified by the American Hospital Formulary Service) were nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, cardiac drugs, and benzodiazepines; a list comparable to the most frequently prescribed drugs in older adults. The pharmacist was able to respond to 853 (27%) of the 3,172 enquiries without reference material. The most frequently used sources of information were the USP Drug information, Volumes I & II, and the Compendium of Pharmaceuticals and Specialties. Follow-up calls on certain consumer enquiries indicated that 89% of the recommendations were adhered to, suggesting a beneficial influence of this type of drug information service on medication use.